Mixed Blessing: Texas Rangers in the Mexican War

As part of his Masters in Military Science degree, Major Ian Lyles discussed the Texas Rangers as part of Compound Warfare in the Mexican-American War.  Texians - as they were called at the time - had spent a decade fighting both Mexicans and Comanche.  During that time, they developed a mode of fighting that was particularly suited to those opponents.  This made the Rangers an ideal addition to the US Army.  Long exposure to Mexican armies taught them that surrender likely meant execution (e.g., Alamo, Goliad, Mier) and white flags were more likely to be a ruse than an honest request to surrender or parley.  Rangers had long operated far from support and thus came heavily armed, typically with a rifle, one or two revolvers, and a Bowie knife.  They proved to be outstanding scouts, excellent skirmishers, effective cavalry, and even competent infantry when needed.

On the other hand, they brought some grudges with them.  Their scouting missions might make detours to capture or kill Mexican bandits.  The Rangers had learned from the Comanche not to take prisoners.  When not actively in the field, they often caused trouble while in the various Mexican cities and towns.  They had rarely been given quarter and were thus inclined not to give it.  Both General Taylor and General Scott learned to keep the Rangers active to avoid the troubles that were stirred up among the Mexican civilians.  However, neither wanted to send the Rangers home; they were extremely effective at countering the guerrilla activity in both the northern theater and on the road from Vera Cruz to Mexico City.

The quality of Texian troops was often equal to the quality of their leader.  When John Hayes, Ben McColloch, or Samuel Walker was in charge, the Rangers caused few problems while resolving many.  When lesser men were in charge, the Rangers could wreak havoc on the locals and incite the local populace.  However, more often than not, it was volunteer troops who caused trouble and Texas Rangers who got the blame.

Lyles returns to the idea of Compound Warfare frequently.  Though Texas Rangers were newly-minted American citizens (and virtually all of them had migrated from the US anyway), they did not operate as either state volunteer units or regular army units.  This irregular force thus became a unique unit that brought skills and abilities unavailable in other forces.  Lyles mentioned the Northern Alliance in Afghanistan as compound warfare.

The paper is available online.  Recommended.

Radicalized by Higher Education

 

Is college radicalizing Americans?  This chart demonstrates that those most in favor of violence are the most educated.  That strikes me as backwards.  Shouldn't more education lead to support of less violence?

When Good Will Hunting was all the rage in the theaters, I recall being unimpressed.  Sure, Robin Williams was great, but this Will Hunting guy didn't make sense to me.  He is a genius and a prolific reader with an encyclopedic knowledge of many subjects who is nonetheless prone to violence.  He's both the smartest person in the room but dumb as a box of rocks.  Smart people avoid violence whenever possible, but not this guy.

The chart shows a clear correlation between the amount of education and the acceptability of violence to get one's way.  It is interesting how it goes down with 2 years of college but rises afterwards.  Odd.  Maybe Good Will Hunting understood something that I didn't.

Cole Allen, the would-be assassin, has a bachelor's degree in mechanical engineering, a master's in computer science, and clearly falls into the 40% of graduates who believe violence is necessary.

You Were Never Really Here (2017)

Joe (Joaquin Phoenix) is a former soldier and FBI agent who has transitioned into private work.  He recovers missing girls, frequently leaving their kidnappers dead.  Joe has seen a lot of dark stuff in his life, from his abusive father, to murdered kids in the Middle East, to dead children piled in a van.  He suffers dark thoughts and regularly ponders suicide.  Perhaps the only reason he does not commit suicide is that he is caring for his elderly mother (Judith Robert).

Hired to recover a NY State Senator's daughter, Joe buys a hammer and duct tape.  He beats several men to death with the hammer before carrying Nina (Ekaterina Samsonov) to safety.  However, it is not the father who comes to collect her.  Joe has been betrayed and finds himself on the run.  Can he unravel what has happened before he gets captured or killed?

After seeing Phoenix as an emaciated Joker, it was strange to see him as a stout fighter.  He is quite good in the role, which is important since he is the movie.  The is the story of Joe at a particular time in a difficult life.  He's in virtually every scene.  Despite his generally polite demeanor, Joe is a brutal killing machine that moves as quietly as a cat.

The movie doesn't spell out points.  Early on, there are indications that Joe might actually be invisible.  He is extremely good at sneaking up on people so as to beat them over the head with his hammer.  In the novel, Joe is obviously expert at crime scenes (i.e., FBI Agent) and knows exactly how to leave no trace that he was ever there, thus the title.  That didn't come over well in the film.  The senator proves to be the villain, which is not a spoiler.  However, it doesn't make sense in the film.  He sold his daughter to pedophiles and then sent Joe to get her and then betrayed Joe?  Why?  Pedophiles kidnapped his daughter and he knows the address but doesn't send in the police?  The senator is a pedophile and his daughter escaped to another bunch of pedophiles?  Yeah, I don't see how it fits together and the movie doesn't explain.

Just okay.

Southern Poverty Law Center Exposed

In Star Wars: The Phantom Menace (1999), Senator Palpatine used the Federation's blockade of Naboo to create a crisis in the Galactic Senate.  The government of Chancellor Valorum collapsed and Palpatine became the new Chancellor.  In Attack of the Clones, Count Dooku led many planets to secede from the Galactic Republic, which led to Chancellor Palpatine creating the clone army to fight a galactic civil war, the Clone Wars.  Finally, in Revenge of the Sith, Supreme Chancellor Palpatine used his clone army to wipe out the Jedi, the only force left to oppose his rise to Emperor.  The Galactic Empire was born.

In each movie, Palpatine is the instigator of the crisis that he then must fight.  In Phantom, his disciple, Darth Maul, was advising the Federation, creating the very crisis that led to Palpatine's chancellorship.  In Attack, his next disciple, Dooku, stoked the civil war that required an army of clones - answerable to the Chancellor - to put down.  In the final film, he used the gaslit and brainwashed Anakin Skywalker to kill the Jedi-in-training while his clone army killed the rest that were in the field.  Darth Sidious was a brilliant manipulator who engineered his rise by creating crises to expand his influence and power.

That brings us to the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC).  The SPLC has spent years funding the very things they claim to fight, exactly like Palpatine.  The SPLC funded Charlottesville's Unite the Right rally that became a huge source of anti-Trump talking points.  They have funded hate groups and then called upon donors to help fight the rise of those very hate groups.  If the SPLC wasn't funding these hate groups, would there be enough hate to fund the SPLC?  Apparently not, or they wouldn't do it.

Worse, the FBI had to know about this long before now.  This is willful blindness on their part.  But why?  The FBI is a part of big government and, by its very nature, it is going to support that which leads to bigger government.  That is the problem with the Deep State.  The SPLC is pro-big government and therefore has been given a pass by Deep Staters.  The Deep State is the Empire and it will eagerly destroy those who oppose them, while also overlooking the crimes of their allies.

Yet Another Assassin

Cole Thomas Allen, a 31-year-old teacher from California, sprinted into the Correspondents' Dinner last night with guns and knives.  He shot one Secret Service agent before being subdued.  President Trump, the First Lady, VP, Secretary of State, Secretary of War, and many others were quickly evacuated.

Yet again, a crackpot has sought to kill Donald Trump.  Leftist pundits like Hassan Piker have floated the idea that it would be great if someone would assassinate Trump.  In response to the assassination attempt last night, a Wisconsin brewery announced that it would distribute free beer the day after Trump's murder.  Accusing Trump of being a fascist or a new iteration of Hitler is so common as to be unremarkable now.  And what is one of the most common bits of time travel stories: kill Hitler to prevent the Holocaust.  The assassin in such sci-fi is lauded.  Ergo, if Trump is Hitler and it would have been commendable to kill Hitler before he could carry out his policies, then it follows that killing Trump is not only logical, but worthy of praise.

If one person out of a hundred thousand is dumb enough to swallow the fallacy that Trump is the next coming of Hitler, that would create more than 3,000 potential assassins in the US.  People who disagreed with Charlie Kirk, who had no ability to implement any policies, called him a fascist.  A crackpot came out of the woodwork and killed him.  Leftists not only approved of his murder, they posted themselves celebrating online.

This is why Tim Pool thinks we may already be in a Civil War.  We're certainly in a time that echoes the 1850s.

What? (1972)

Nancy (Sydne Rome) is an American who is traveling the world.  On this particular night, she is in a car with a trio of Italians, one of whom asks if she was raped while traveling in Afghanistan.  Of course not, she always meets nice people.  So the Italians pull to the side of the road and attempt to rape the naive and clueless American.  Luckily, she slips away with only her diary and uses an elevator to a villa to escape.  Treating her as just another guest, an older man shows her to a room and a maid makes the bed.  Her shirt is badly torn and she wore neither bra nor panties, so she climbs naked into bed.  In the morning, her shirt is gone, so she wanders the villa holding her diary to her chest.

The villa is occupied by a bizarre collection of people.  There is Alex (Marcello Mastroianni) the former pimp who has the hots for Nancy.  There is Mosquito (Roman Polanski), who is feuding with Alex and wears Nancy's shirt - it has been mended.  There is the naked girl who goes daily to the beach with only a big-brimmed hat and high heels.  There are a pair of ping pong players, one of whom is a sex addict whose pelvis thrusts even when he sleeps.  There is the priest who warns Nancy to get out while she can.  The pianist who repeatedly explains his arthritis and then commences to play the piano.  All of these odd balls are somehow involved with Joseph Noblart (Hugh Griffith), the owner of the villa who is quite sick.

Despite having nearly been raped, Nancy doesn't contact the authorities.  Instead, she gets involved with the creepy Alex, who treats her poorly.  She is repeatedly warned against him, told he has syphilis, sees him antagonize others, but nonetheless falls victim - albeit willing - to his seduction.  In fact, she reacted with great interest when he said he had been a pimp.  When he had her handcuffed on the beach and thrashed her with a branch, she proclaimed her love for him.  What?

The movie is an excuse to get Sydne Rome naked.  She spends a lot of time topless and has several scenes of full nudity.  Her acting is wooden.  She is mostly a wide-eyed naif who is astonished by each trial she endures.  This is the kind of movie that gave European films a bad reputation in America.

Roman Polanski had high expectations for this film and agreed to direct Chinatown based on the opening box office of this film.  That proved to be $64.  Yeah, that sounds about right.

Skip.

That Lucky Touch (1975)

Michael Scott (Roger Moore) is an arms dealer.  Julia Richardson is a single mother and freelance reporter.  By chance, they are neighbors in an apartment building.  While Michael is trying to sell a revolutionary gun to NATO during the annual war games held in Belgium, Julia is digging for a story that can paint the military in a negative light.  Julia's ex-husband was a staff officer for General Henry Steedman (Lee J. Cobb), so she is a close friend of the general's wife, Diana Steedman (Shelley Winters).  As a well-known arms dealer, Michael has pitched his gun to General Steedman.  Inevitably, Michael and Julia find themselves thrust into one another's company.  As a pacifist do-gooder, Julia is horrified by Michael's line of work but she also finds him attractive.

Not exactly a rom-com, but it has its moments of high-comedy; Lee J. Cobb answering the red phone at headquarters is the peak.  I never thought of Cobb as a comedy actor.  Roger Moore plays against type by having terrible luck with women.  However, he does have that Bond talent for gambling.  Susannah York is mostly a source of trouble.  The general knows that she's going to paint him badly in a forthcoming article and, sure enough, she does.  Moreover, she engineered a lot of the trouble.  Considering that he had Sophie (Sydne Rome) as a steady bedmate, it was foolhardy for Michael to be making a pass at Julia.

Made between The Man with the Golden Gun (1974) and The Spy Who Loved Me (1977), the poster plays up Moore's Bond persona.  That is solely for marketing and deceived viewers on what to expect.

Just okay.