Recently, Matt Walsh - of What is a Woman? fame - has been producing true history documentaries. He has tackled the Civil War, Slavery, and the American Indian. Concerning that last one, Atun-Shei Films made a response video. Atun-Shei has produced the brilliant Checkmate, Lincolnites! series, which is a deep dive into primary materials that thoroughly tears down faux justifications for the South. Here are two YouTubers I have greatly appreciated. This clash should be informative.
Walsh sought to dispel the peaceful, environmentalist ideal that has be painted of the Native Americans in recent decades. They fought brutal wars before Europeans arrived and continued to do so afterwards. They could be quite brutal in war and savage to captives. He dismisses the smallpox blankets as untrue, states that there was no genocide, talks about a difference in private property rights, and spends some time on the Trail of Tears. At an hour, it is just a general overview with the primary purpose of challenging the modern narrative.
Atun-Shei begins by pouring himself a drink before denouncing Walsh and being generally offended by every part of the documentary. Though clearly infuriated by each section of the documentary, he concedes that the gist is true, but it is more complicated than that. His best point was where he challenged the private property topic, which Walsh handled in an apples and oranges sort of comparison. Where his other videos are well-produced and scripted, this one felt like an extemporaneous drunken rant.
After watching both, I have to side with Walsh. His goal was to bust the myth of the peaceful noble savage that has become the default narrative. Yes, Atun-Shei is correct on saying many of Walsh's points are oversimplified, but he conceded that each point is true. Of course, he titled his response as Matt Walsh Hates Indigenous People. The tone of presentation makes a big difference in the watchability of each. Walsh offers a fairly neutral recitation of his thesis, while Atun-Shei answers with an angry, profanity-laced, rebuttal.
If you have a couple of hours free, this is probably not the best use of your time. If you are interested in the topic, see for yourself which YouTuber makes a better case.
