Jonathan Turley offered a keen insight about the Hunter Biden's emails regarding the Biden Campaign's reaction. There are three obvious responses that have not been offered.
1. That's not Hunter's laptop. If it's not his laptop, say so. Get in front of this hoax. That the campaign hasn't pursued this line of attack says they think it probably is Hunter's laptop.
2. Those aren't Hunter's emails. If this is bogus, why not challenge the authenticity of the emails or the pictures. No claims that these are fake. Interesting.
3. Defamation. A major paper has printed clearly defamatory claims against Hunter Biden and, if it's not true, he should be suing them.
Rather than deny the authenticity of the claims, the campaign has offered specific responses regarding Joe Biden's schedule not showing the meeting reported in the emails. Huh. Well, if it isn't on his schedule, it must not have happened because nothing gets left off the schedule. This doesn't exactly sound like a denial.
It is clear that Hunter Biden got his high paying position in Burisma because he was the Vice President's son. Why else would a foreign company hire a man who was kicked out of the navy for drug use? Not for his judgement. Could it be that his father was the point man for Ukraine in the Obama Administration? No, that's just a coincidence.
No comments:
Post a Comment