Showing posts with label J. J. Abrams. Show all posts
Showing posts with label J. J. Abrams. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 7, 2016

Westworld (HBO season finale)

Spoilers follow so be warned.

The 10th and final episode for the season has started a war between humans and hosts, explained the fate of Arnold, and even saw the retirement of Robert Ford.  The show has generally vilified humans while making heroes out of the robots.  Even so, I want the humans to win.

Perhaps I missed something but I am mystified by Arnold's thinking.  He holds that the hosts are conscious - or will soon become so - and that a life as a host in a repetitive loop which frequently ends in rape or death would be a hellish existence.  He tried to convince Robert of this but failed.  Okay, your partner wants to open the park.  In order to prevent him, you 'kill' all the hosts and commit suicide by host.  Why the suicide?  He mentions something along the lines that Robert can't recreate the hosts without him.  Okay, why does that require your death?  His reasoning is terrible.  Worse yet, Robert repeats it!  Shortly after Arnold's death, Robert sees that consciousness is coming but they need time.  Finally, the time has come.  The hosts have been achieving consciousness and 'going insane' and Robert has allowed it.  To signify that a new phase in Westworld, he has the same host kill him as killed Arnold.  What?  What is with these suicidal robot-builders?

So the bottom line is that a couple of men built robots and decided that the robots needed to be free.  Arnold thought genocide of the robots was the best option.  Robert thought that slaughtering the humans was the better choice.  In the end, we are expected to side with the robots in their effort to exterminate or subjugate the humans.  It's the next civil rights struggle.
 
On another point, there is the Man in Black, who proves to be an aged William.  He repeatedly says that Westworld is the most real thing but is annoyed that the hosts can't really fight back.  Humans always win.  Then how is this the most real thing?  Do you want to lose a gunfight?  Apparently.  Though wounded, he was still alive by the end and may have the opportunity to lose next season.

Many questions remain unanswered.  Why kill Theresa?  You've foiled her plot to get data out of the park via rogue hosts.  If you know you are going to launch Operation: Host Rebellion in a few days, why not let her live until then?  Why kill Elsie?  Elsie has shown loyalty to Bernard and is the person who uncovered Theresa's effort to smuggle data out of Westworld.  She is a clear ally and yet she is killed by Bernard.  To what end?  What exactly does Ford expect to happen now that the hosts are 'free' to kill humans?  They have the skillset of Old West characters and have likely just triggered a military response.  In that case, perhaps Ford is trying to cause a host genocide just like Arnold.  Also, we have seen Dolores express grief and guilt over killing Arnold and yet, now that she is sentient, the first thing she does is repeat that act by killing Robert.  Huh?

Like Game of Thrones, one of the charms of Westworld was not knowing the backstory, only getting glimpses and hints.  Unlike in GoT, the backstories here prove unworkable and generally stupid.  The great acting, outstanding sets, engrossing action, and plentiful nudity distract from the plot holes that litter the series.

As J. J. Abrams is involved, I know there are lots of additional 'mystery boxes' that have yet to be opened that may explain some of the issues listed.  However, he has a record of leaving gaping holes in plots in his Star Trek installments, Star Wars, and Super 8.  Why would Westworld be any different?  I doubt Michael Crichton would be impressed by this production.

Monday, December 21, 2015

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

The movie is good but unfocused and repetitive. Our story opens on the desert planet of Jakku where Poe Dameron is acquiring a map that will allow the Resistance to locate Luke Skywalker, last of the Jedi. Just like Leia in the original movie, Poe’s location is attacked and he must hide the map in a droid before he is captured. The droid then falls into the hands of a young woman named Rey. The Force Awakens could as easily have been named A Newer Hope. Yes, it has an amazing number of similarities to the first movie. Here is a description I found on the Star Wars message board of IMDB:

A rag-tag group of heroes on a desert planet finds a droid with important information. They smuggle it off-planet to the resistance, who are fighting against the imperials. During the climax, they have to rescue the female of the group, disable the shield generator, and destroy the weak spot of the imperial's super weapon, which has the power to destroy planets. During the climax, the old mentor of the group is tragically cut down by the main villain, an evil force user. Despite this, the resistance manages to destroy the super-weapon and temporarily defeat the imperial army.

Yeah, lots of similarities. Our group on the desert planet is Rey and Finn. Rey is shown to have been left – for reasons unknown – on Jakku as a child. She lives in the ruins of an imperial walker and makes a living by scavenging parts from a crashed imperial cruiser. She rescues a droid from another scavenger. Finn the former Stormtrooper arrives on scene and joins her. The two then flee as the First Order seeks to recover the droid. They steal a ship that Rey judges to be garbage; it’s the Millennium Falcon. No sooner have they evaded the First Order and gotten into orbit when the ship is caught in a tractor beam and taken aboard an unknown ship.

Enter Han and Chewy. Han offers a brief explanation of how the Falcon was stolen and it has taken this long to track it down. Of course, we have hardly made introductions than Han’s bigger ship – which is never named – is boarded by two sets of criminals looking to collect money from Han. This actually bothered me. Han comes across as a newbie smuggler looking for the big score rather than a seasoned veteran who doesn’t make such rookie mistakes. In the original trilogy, Han had to dump Jabba’s cargo before his ship was boarded. He was competent but he got unlucky. Here, with his weakly comic fast-talking to the two sets of criminals, he comes across as incompetent. This is not the right way for Han to be comic relief. This is a very mellow and dispirited Han Solo. That is explained with later reveals but he felt a shadow of his former self. His death is telegraphed long before it occurs, which drained a lot of the tension. By the time he walks out onto the bridge, it is anticlimactic. I think I would have preferred the fiery old Han lecturing his son about being a damned fool to follow that old fossil Snoke and Ben suddenly snapping and killing him. Anyway, it is widely known that Harrison Ford wanted to be killed off during the original trilogy so his wish finally being granted here is even less of a surprise.

Rey grows in the force at an alarming rate. We first saw hints of her force ability when she flew the Falcon. Then, she really came to life when she resisted Kylo Ren’s interrogation. Though he has had training, he soon finds that Rey turns the tables and reads his mind! He has hardly left the cell when she mind controlled a Stormtrooper (played by Daniel “James Bond” Craig) into releasing her. Soon thereafter, she stomps an admittedly wounded Kylo in a lightsaber duel. Heck, she is already well beyond where Luke was at the beginning of Empire Strikes Back and he had had some instruction from a Jedi Master. Obviously, she is the character that the title references but it did seem that her advancement in the force came entirely too quickly and easily.

Fin is an oddity that wasn’t explained. Is he the only Stormtrooper to ever balk from butchery? What makes him different? If he has been ‘conditioned’ since childhood, why is he so normal around non-conditioned people? Are all Stormtroopers this affable once you take off the armor? Also, I found it irritating that the enemy didn’t just shoot him. During the fight at the ruins of Maz Kanata’s, he is called a traitor and then attacked. Okay, so that Stormtrooper recognizes him. Why not just shoot him? It isn’t as if Fin could have blocked blaster fire with the lightsaber. No, the Stormtrooper converted his weapon into some sort of energy club that could block a lightsaber. If you are the kind of guy who guns down unarmed villagers, why aren’t you the kind of guy who guns down traitors? Obviously because that would have killed off Fin. Screenwriters need to stop rescuing important characters by having villains act stupidly.

Poe, who is the first hero we meet, vanishes for much of the film. When he is brought back, he takes the role of lead pilot. It isn’t Star Wars unless you have some exciting space battles and our other characters aren’t yet suited for that. So in comes Poe and his squadron of x-wings. He is pretty exclusively a pilot in the movie.

Kylo Ren is initially very intimidating but, as we get to know him, proves to be a conflicted and moody villain. His tantrums are hilarious. Where his grandfather would Force choke underlings to death to release stress, Kylo hacks inanimate objects to shreds with his lightsaber. In the wake of his betrayal of the Jedi, he is used to being the only person who can use the Force but he has a rude awakening when he squares off with Rey. His lightsaber with its almost flame-like blade strikes me as another sign that he is still unskilled. The blade is unstable which, though scary, also implies that he didn’t put it together quite right. Though a lot of grief is being heaped on the character, I liked him. He is what Anakin should have been in the prequel trilogy: very conflicted, at times menacing, at times vulnerable. Anikin was just one long woe-is-me it’s not fair the Jedi are evil whine. Piling the chemistry-free love interest with Padme only made it worse. So, Kylo is a vast improvement and I expect he will mature into a more Vader-like villain by the next movie. Killing his father puts him solidly on the Dark Side of the Force and should purge his conflicted feelings.

General Hux is an arrogant and surprisingly young leader. I was initially surprised at how he spoke down to Kylo Ren but that only further demonstrated that Kylo wasn’t a Vader clone. Where Grand Moff Tarkin insouciantly stayed on the Death Star despite being told “there is a danger,” Hux was the first to evacuate Starkiller Base. Wow, these are some villains. The First Order is proving to be a pale imitation of the Empire.

Captain Phasma decided to shut down the shield because a traitor – who had recently demonstrated that he couldn’t shoot unarmed villagers - held a gun to her head. The fate of Starkiller Base is sealed by her decision. Phasma is shown to be a sad excuse for a Stormtrooper and utterly undeserving of her conspicuously shiny armor. Doubtless, she will return but her character has been damaged.

What is the political situation thirty years after the deaths of the Emperor and Darth Vader? General Leia appears to command a single base with a few dozen X-wings. She is part of The Resistance. Resistance to what? The Empire is gone, right? There is a New Republic. We saw the capitol planet of the New Republic destroyed, right? Why aren’t Leia, Akbar, and all the rest part of the military of this New Republic? Where are the capital ships aligned with the Republic or the Resistance? The planet where Leia is based is going to be destroyed and the best she can muster is a couple of dozen fighters? Wow, that’s pathetic. It very much seems like the First Order is the governing body though, at the same time, they are talking about conquest. But there is virtually nothing standing in your way? Why did you bother with the planet killer if there isn’t anyone actually opposing you?

The First Order comes across as generally incompetent. Not one but two of our heroes escape in separate incidents. During one of those escapes, another team has simultaneously infiltrated the base. Their impressive Starkiller Base, like previous planet vaporizing weapons, manages to take one shot before it is destroyed by a handful of enemies. The First Order has great set designers but they aren’t so great at the fighting. Of the many battles that First Order fought, they only won one, which was when they attacked a mostly unarmed village. Not an auspicious beginning for the forces of darkness.

There is a new and bigger death star. Wow, we haven’t gone there before. Granted, that first one was really quite cool. It was unfortunate that it was destroyed before it got to really instill terror across the galaxy. The second one was pathetic and a death trap. It blew up ships here and there but never got to target a planet. This new one is stupid. I can accept a moon-sized space station with a cannon that is powerful enough to destroy a planet. Hey, it’s just physics. A big enough gun will turn a planet into an asteroid field. But Starkiller Base is different. First, it is in System A while the target planet is in System X. The ‘projectile’ is fired and traverses who knows how many light years in mere moments. Moreover, the projectile – which appears as just an energy beam – has a guidance system that allows it to turn toward the target planet. Maybe that was gravity pulling it to the targets? No, at the speed it was going, a black hole would have trouble modifying its trajectory. I would have gone for a massive torpedo. Yeah, that would be doable. Modify some obsolete frigate, fill it with explosives, and have it hit a planet at light speed. The Starkiller just defied physics. Worse, there was that stupid visual of the planets exploding. If a planet around Alpha Centauri exploded, we wouldn’t know about it on Earth for years. And we certainly wouldn’t be able to see the explosion during daylight with the naked eye! Even though this is science-fantasy, this really grated on me. Much as I think it has been done quite enough, I would have preferred Death Star 3 to this travesty.

This far, far away galaxy has never heard of a history book. In the first trilogy, characters have never heard of the Jedi and find the Force to be something bizarre. But in the prequels, the Jedi Council is a branch of galactic governance, its members are the generals during the Clone Wars. Heck, Chewy fought alongside Yoda! Now in this one, Rey thinks Luke Skywalker is a myth! That Han has to confirm Luke’s existence is just odd. “The Berlin Wall, the Cold War. It’s all true.” Even in the prequels, this problem persisted. In such a technologically advanced society, how did a whole star system just vanish from the star charts and only some short order cook knew about it?

Speaking of star charts, what was with that kooky map? In the super high-tech world of Star Wars, there is no such thing as email. The map is on a memory chip of some kind and can never be copied or transmitted. Moreover, shouldn’t it just be galactic coordinates. I’m sure there must be some mapping system similar to latitude and longitude that would map even unexplored regions. Even when the data is at the Resistance base in the dormant R2-D2, it is inaccessible. How does technology work in this galaxy? Of course, this could now be a complaint of the original movie. Why didn’t Leia just email the Death Star plans to the Rebel Alliance? Email was virtually unknown in 1977. In 2015, we can watch a movie on a phone that fits in our pocket. It is troubling that some of our current technology exceeds that of the Star Wars universe.

Luke does not appear until the final scene. He was kept out of the story because including him would have undercut the new characters. Really, once Luke is on scene, he becomes the central character while everyone else is a sidekick. Though I understand the reasoning, it makes Luke look bad. One of his apprentices has just turned to the Dark Side and killed the other Jedi trainees so Luke runs away and hides? Moreover, he left some sort of map to find him? Are we playing hide and seek? It is going to take some good writing to rehabilitate Luke from this apparently cowardly act.

The most important thing about The Force Awakens is the absence of a Jar Jar Binks character. Nor was there any mention of midi-chlorians. And, as already mentioned, the central character wasn’t a plaintive Anakin. Yes, it is a rehash, it has lots of unanswered questions, it used some weak plot devices, but it was fun. Most of the characters have lots of promise for future development.

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Star Trek in Collapse

Here is an article that delves into the changing morality of Star Trek from the Original Series in the 1960s, through the Next Generation, and up to the recent movie, Star Trek Into Darkness.

I was a huge fan of the original series.  I loved Kirk, Spock, McCoy, Scotty, et al.  So when The Next Generation arrived, I was excited.  I watched the premiere and was not thrilled.  I watched that first season and, though I could not effectively explain why, I didn't much like it.  I was politically unaware at the time and the underlying philosophies of both the Original Series and The Next Generation didn't occur to me.
 
In my review of the latest Star Trek movie, I complained about the mindlessness of it but this article gets to the heart of the matter.  It is interesting how Sandefur tracks liberal political ideology in a SciFi TV/movie series.

Tuesday, January 21, 2014

Star Trek Into Darkness

Our story opens on an alien planet where a figure in a gray robe flees from a temple while the natives chase him, throwing spears on the way. The figure proves to be Captain James T Kirk who had stolen – for reasons never explained – a scroll from said temple thus the ire of the natives. Gee, this almost looks like the opening scene from Raiders of the Lost Ark. Kirk soon joins Dr. McCoy and the pair continues to run for their lives. What was the plan here? Meanwhile, Spock, Sulu, and Uhura are in a shuttle hovering over an active volcano located next to the temple. Spock is lowered into the volcano so he can plant a device to prevent it from erupting and thus wiping out the natives. Well, things don’t work quite as planned. The shuttle engines overheat and the tether to Spock breaks. Was there a plan here? Simple, we just beam Spock to the ship. Where’s the Enterprise? Oh, it is underwater! Kirk and Bones jump off a cliff and swim down to the submerged SPACE ship. Though Scotty was able to beam Sulu and Uhura to safely before the shuttle crashed, he can’t lock onto Spock except by line of sight. The ship’s current position is a real problem, seeing as there is ocean and continent in the way. What genius decided to park the ship in an ocean? Well, since we are in this really stupid position, the only way to save Spock is to break the Prime Directive (note that was the Prime directive, not the secondary or tertiary directive). The ship surfaces to the natives’ astonishment and as it flies over the volcano, Spock is beamed aboard. And there you have the introduction to J. J. Abrams latest travesty in the Star Trek universe.

Knowing that the objective was to prevent the volcano from erupting and wiping out the primitive natives, what might have been a better plan? Maybe setting the anti-volcano device on a several second delay and transporting it from orbit? Oh, but look at all the awesome action we’d miss! As for Kirk stealing the holy scroll, I am still baffled. Why? My best guess is that he was trying to lure the natives away from the impending detonation. Even so, I have no idea why Bones would be there. Is he particularly suited to running from natives? The sad thing is that it gets worse.

Lacking any original ideas, the writers bring back Khan (i.e. Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan) as a villain. Khan has magic blood that appears to be a cure for death. Yep, Dr. McCoy synthesizes a serum that revives a dead tribble and maybe a major character that dies in a scene stolen from… Wrath of Khan. I was really annoyed when the last film had Kirk and Scotty beam aboard the Enterprise while it was light years away and traveling at warp speed. This time, we have a personal transportation device that allows the villain to transport himself from Earth to the Klingon home world! Really? Such technology is going to make starships obsolete. Such a technology would massively revolutionize space travel and is far beyond what was possible in Star Trek The Next Generation. As for the starships, warp speed has really gotten impressive. The ship is a short distance from the Klingon home world – which the Klingons seem not to notice – and warps back toward Earth. They have hardly hit warp speed when an enemy ship catches them and blasts the Enterprise. So, where are we? Oh, pretty much in Earth orbit. So the distance from Earth to the Klingon home world is a few minutes at warp speed? Two starships are essentially in Earth orbit and one fires at the other. Earth responds by doing nothing. One of the starships is on a collision course with San Francisco and the response is… nothing. We have all of Earth and the only people who can do anything are the crew of the Enterprise.

Benedict Cumberbatch seems nothing like Khan. First, it is a bit annoying that we have a pasty white fellow playing Khan. But Khan had a combination of charm and menace, a man who would smile warmly while he twisted the knife. Cumberbatch is all menace and brooding.

Scotty goes scouting coordinates that Kirk gave him. He finds a space station there. Amazingly, the space station doesn’t seem to notice him. In a miracle of timing, some ships arrive and enter the space station – Scotty just joins the group and enters unseen. Seriously? This is a military space station and it neither noticed the approach of a shuttle or that the shuttle came aboard. Well, such incompetence probably explains later parts of the film.

So, Scotty is off the ship and Kirk needs a new chief engineer. Let’s see, I have all these engineers down in engineering, one of whom is probably second only to Scotty. So, let’s pick Chekov. Yes, I understand you don’t want to introduce new characters but this still grated.

Spock and Uhura are involved and their relationship is repeatedly brought to the foreground, often with Uhura nagging Spock for his logic and lack of feelings. Umm, you know he’s a Vulcan, right? But, just to prove he’s got feelings, a tear runs down his cheek when a major character dies. Oh, and Kirk cries too when a different character dies. I don’t think William Shatner’s Kirk ever cried, even when those Klingon bastards killed his son. The Spock – Uhura relationship was ill-conceived.

Chris Pine’s Kirk is disappointing. It’s not that I think he should emulate Shatner, but it would be nice if he kept to the character. His Kirk is frantic rather than deliberate, foolhardy rather than brave, and reckless rather than daring. At one point, we see him in bed with two alien women. Really? He has to be convinced not to do something rash on more than one occasion. At another point in the movie, he is faced with the Kobyashi Maru moment where he’s going to lose his ship and crew and his response is… “I’m sorry.” In Wrath of Khan, Kirk repeatedly outmaneuvered Khan but here it is the other way around. Kirk captures him only because he chose to surrender. Kirk survives a spacewalk only because Khan guides him, and Kirk survives secondary villains only because of Khan. Khan plays Kirk the entire time but Kirk blusters as if he is the one in control. Sigh.

The plot is just an opportunity to string together unlikely action sequences. There is an amazing amount of running! It’s all very exciting mindless fun. And that is the biggest problem. Star Trek was never mindless. If anything, the Kirk era of Star Trek was preachy with a morality tale in virtually every episode. Kirk often explained the moral at the end. If there is any moral here, it is that the enemy is us. Yeah. Again with the self-loathing and we made Khan what he is and those chickens have come home to roost. Lovely.

With what J. J. Abrams has done to Star Trek, I am concerned what he plans to do with the other great sci-fi classic, Star Wars. Well, he probably can’t do any worse than Lucas did in Phantom Menace.