Showing posts with label Harrison Ford. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harrison Ford. Show all posts

Sunday, September 10, 2023

Indiana Jones and the Dial of Destiny (2023)

Indiana Jones (Harrison Ford) and Basil Shaw (Toby Jones) have been captured by Nazis at the end of World War II.  They were in search of the Spear of Destiny, which proved to be a fake.  Instead, they stumbled upon the Antikythera Mechanism in the possession of Dr. Voller (Mads Mikkelsen).  The pair - mostly Indy - fight their way through a Nazi train and miraculously survive.

In 1969, Indy awoke to loud music from a young neighbor.  After getting dressed, he heads to Hunter College, where he teaches.  The students are mostly disinterested though one offers all the answers to any question he poses.  Helena (Phoebe Waller-Bridge) was not a student, but rather the daughter of Basil Shaw.  She declares her interest in the Antikythera Mechanism and proposes that they go hunting for it.  As luck would have it, it is in a storage vault at Hunter College.  No sooner does she lay hands on it than murderous CIA agents arrive.  Helena flees, leaving Indy to deal with the CIA.  The CIA is in league with Dr. Voller, who became part of the US Space Program since the war.  Sallah (John Rhys-Davies), who moved to New York after the war to become a cab driver, provides Indy with his adventure gear and passport so he can chase after Helena.  He finds her in Morrocco, attempting to sell the Antikythera.  Instead, Voller arrives and absconds with it.  Now Indy, Helena, and Teddy (Ethann Isidore) must find the other part of the Antikythera before Voller does.

The movie is better than I expected, but not good.  Though spry for his age, Harrison Ford is no longer suited for this kind of role.  Helena is an inexplicable character.  Here she steals from Indy and has no concern that she has left him at the mercy of murders.  Despite being the daughter of a committed academic, she likes to sell antiquities to the highest bidder.  Then she is chased by her former fiance who intends to lop off her head.  Talk about a toxic relationship.  When half of her allies are murdered by Voller's goons, she is more thrilled about how she, Indy, and Teddy escaped.  It is hard to determine what her motivations are.  Teddy could have been eliminated altogether.  The idea that he learned to fly from a drunken pilot based on cardboard cutouts is ludicrous.  However, to have the epic motorcycle chasing plane scene, they needed a third character to fly the rescue plane.  Ugh.

Time travel?  Why'd it have to be time travel?  I hate time travel.  Yes, it turns out that Archimedes invented a time travel device, but it only allows roundtrips from current time to the Siege of Syracuse (216 BC) and back.  How in the hell did the Nazis manage to get their plane shot down by Roman siege weapons?  Seriously, why don't you gain some altitude?  No, we're going to skim back and forth 40 yards above the Roman ships until they shoot us down.  Behold the stupidity.

The special effects were disappointing.  Sometimes, the de-aging of Harrison Ford was great.  Most of the time, it looked off.  The chased through the tickertape parade looked particularly bad.  Doubtless it is much cheaper to computer animate a parade through New York City, but this is really a scene that should have been filmed via practical effects.  Heck, a lot of it should have been.  The boat full of eels was likewise unconvincing.  Too much green screen and not enough stuntmen.

The marital issues with Indy and Marion over Mutt's death in Vietnam was unnecessary background.  It just made for a depressing Indy.  Look, Indy is old, his son is dead, his wife has filed for divorce, his students are not interested in his class, his career is over with his retirement after class, he hands his retirement gift to a random guy on the street, and his god daughter is stealing from him.  It's no wonder that Indy wanted to get left behind to die with Archimedes at the end of the movie.  What have they done to Indiana Jones?

Mostly disappointing.  Watch one of the original three instead.

Sunday, November 20, 2022

The Return of Indiana Jones

A new Indiana Jones movie is expected next year, and it got me to thinking when it will take place.  Let's look at the previous movies.

Raiders of the Lost Ark arrived in theaters in 1981, but took place in 1936.  That is a gap of 45 years.  Harrison Ford was 39 years-old.  He is only 2 years older than Indy should be.

Temple of Doom was released in 1984 but took place in 1935.  The gap has widened to 49 years and Harrison Ford was 42.  He was now 6 years older than Indy.

The Last Crusade opened in 1989, taking place in 1938.  That's 51 years.  Ford was 47, 8 years older than Indy.

Kingdom of the Crystal Skull debuted in 2008, but took place in 1957.  That is again a 51 year gap.  Ford was 66.  Again, 8 years older than Indy.

With all this in mind, when will the latest movie be set?  Ford is now 80.  Henry "Indiana" Jones Jr. was born around 1899, which means he would be 80 in 1979.  In the TV series from 1992, George Hall played a 93 year-old Indy who would offer an intro and outro to that week's episode.  Of course, if we stick with the 51 year gap from the last two movies, it should take place in 1972.

It is long overdue for Indy to be recast.  Harrison Ford should be taking over the role of George Hall, opening the latest adventure by reminiscing on his younger days.  Also, when is he going to get his eye patch?  I always assumed that Old Indy had lost his eye many years ago.  Don't let some stupid cat gouge his eye like Nick Fury.

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Blade Runner 2049

Officer K (Ryan Gosling) flies to some remote farm where he finds Sapper Morton (Dave Bautista), a replicant.  Though K is willing to arrest Sapper and take him in, Sapper decides to resist.  The brawl is vicious and K is unusually tough.  After he has dealt with Sapper, K notices a flower next to a dead tree.  His scanners show a crate buried.  He calls for a dig team and then reports back to HQ.  It turns out that K is a replicant and must pass a personality test to demonstrate he is still working inside parameters.
 
The Tyrell Corporation collapsed shortly after the events of the original movie and was purchased by Niander Wallace.  Wallace has discovered that Tyrell made a replicant that could sexually reproduce!  Her name was Rachel.  The movie is a competition between Wallace's top lieutenant, Luv, and Officer K to find the offspring of Rick Deckard and Rachel.
 
Harrison Ford doesn't appear for an hour and a half, so Gosling has to carry this film.  Not being a Gosling fan, I'd say he fell short.  It was interesting that the main character is a replicant and his primary love interest is a hologram.  This was kind of interesting and one finds Joi (Ana de Armas) to be enjoyable.  However, this turns on its head when K runs into a 3D add for the Joi home companion; she was just a well-designed program, nothing more, and yet he had invested himself in her.  Sad revelation.  However, he's a replicant and has no soul.  Really sucks the meaning out of the relationship.
 
Though I had been very excited for the release of the original Blade Runner (1982), I was indifferent when I finally saw it.  Deckard was actually bad at his job and the pacing was glacial.  Officer K is better at the job than Deckard but the pacing has not improved.
 
Wait for this to come to Netflix or cable.

Monday, December 21, 2015

Star Wars: The Force Awakens

The movie is good but unfocused and repetitive. Our story opens on the desert planet of Jakku where Poe Dameron is acquiring a map that will allow the Resistance to locate Luke Skywalker, last of the Jedi. Just like Leia in the original movie, Poe’s location is attacked and he must hide the map in a droid before he is captured. The droid then falls into the hands of a young woman named Rey. The Force Awakens could as easily have been named A Newer Hope. Yes, it has an amazing number of similarities to the first movie. Here is a description I found on the Star Wars message board of IMDB:

A rag-tag group of heroes on a desert planet finds a droid with important information. They smuggle it off-planet to the resistance, who are fighting against the imperials. During the climax, they have to rescue the female of the group, disable the shield generator, and destroy the weak spot of the imperial's super weapon, which has the power to destroy planets. During the climax, the old mentor of the group is tragically cut down by the main villain, an evil force user. Despite this, the resistance manages to destroy the super-weapon and temporarily defeat the imperial army.

Yeah, lots of similarities. Our group on the desert planet is Rey and Finn. Rey is shown to have been left – for reasons unknown – on Jakku as a child. She lives in the ruins of an imperial walker and makes a living by scavenging parts from a crashed imperial cruiser. She rescues a droid from another scavenger. Finn the former Stormtrooper arrives on scene and joins her. The two then flee as the First Order seeks to recover the droid. They steal a ship that Rey judges to be garbage; it’s the Millennium Falcon. No sooner have they evaded the First Order and gotten into orbit when the ship is caught in a tractor beam and taken aboard an unknown ship.

Enter Han and Chewy. Han offers a brief explanation of how the Falcon was stolen and it has taken this long to track it down. Of course, we have hardly made introductions than Han’s bigger ship – which is never named – is boarded by two sets of criminals looking to collect money from Han. This actually bothered me. Han comes across as a newbie smuggler looking for the big score rather than a seasoned veteran who doesn’t make such rookie mistakes. In the original trilogy, Han had to dump Jabba’s cargo before his ship was boarded. He was competent but he got unlucky. Here, with his weakly comic fast-talking to the two sets of criminals, he comes across as incompetent. This is not the right way for Han to be comic relief. This is a very mellow and dispirited Han Solo. That is explained with later reveals but he felt a shadow of his former self. His death is telegraphed long before it occurs, which drained a lot of the tension. By the time he walks out onto the bridge, it is anticlimactic. I think I would have preferred the fiery old Han lecturing his son about being a damned fool to follow that old fossil Snoke and Ben suddenly snapping and killing him. Anyway, it is widely known that Harrison Ford wanted to be killed off during the original trilogy so his wish finally being granted here is even less of a surprise.

Rey grows in the force at an alarming rate. We first saw hints of her force ability when she flew the Falcon. Then, she really came to life when she resisted Kylo Ren’s interrogation. Though he has had training, he soon finds that Rey turns the tables and reads his mind! He has hardly left the cell when she mind controlled a Stormtrooper (played by Daniel “James Bond” Craig) into releasing her. Soon thereafter, she stomps an admittedly wounded Kylo in a lightsaber duel. Heck, she is already well beyond where Luke was at the beginning of Empire Strikes Back and he had had some instruction from a Jedi Master. Obviously, she is the character that the title references but it did seem that her advancement in the force came entirely too quickly and easily.

Fin is an oddity that wasn’t explained. Is he the only Stormtrooper to ever balk from butchery? What makes him different? If he has been ‘conditioned’ since childhood, why is he so normal around non-conditioned people? Are all Stormtroopers this affable once you take off the armor? Also, I found it irritating that the enemy didn’t just shoot him. During the fight at the ruins of Maz Kanata’s, he is called a traitor and then attacked. Okay, so that Stormtrooper recognizes him. Why not just shoot him? It isn’t as if Fin could have blocked blaster fire with the lightsaber. No, the Stormtrooper converted his weapon into some sort of energy club that could block a lightsaber. If you are the kind of guy who guns down unarmed villagers, why aren’t you the kind of guy who guns down traitors? Obviously because that would have killed off Fin. Screenwriters need to stop rescuing important characters by having villains act stupidly.

Poe, who is the first hero we meet, vanishes for much of the film. When he is brought back, he takes the role of lead pilot. It isn’t Star Wars unless you have some exciting space battles and our other characters aren’t yet suited for that. So in comes Poe and his squadron of x-wings. He is pretty exclusively a pilot in the movie.

Kylo Ren is initially very intimidating but, as we get to know him, proves to be a conflicted and moody villain. His tantrums are hilarious. Where his grandfather would Force choke underlings to death to release stress, Kylo hacks inanimate objects to shreds with his lightsaber. In the wake of his betrayal of the Jedi, he is used to being the only person who can use the Force but he has a rude awakening when he squares off with Rey. His lightsaber with its almost flame-like blade strikes me as another sign that he is still unskilled. The blade is unstable which, though scary, also implies that he didn’t put it together quite right. Though a lot of grief is being heaped on the character, I liked him. He is what Anakin should have been in the prequel trilogy: very conflicted, at times menacing, at times vulnerable. Anikin was just one long woe-is-me it’s not fair the Jedi are evil whine. Piling the chemistry-free love interest with Padme only made it worse. So, Kylo is a vast improvement and I expect he will mature into a more Vader-like villain by the next movie. Killing his father puts him solidly on the Dark Side of the Force and should purge his conflicted feelings.

General Hux is an arrogant and surprisingly young leader. I was initially surprised at how he spoke down to Kylo Ren but that only further demonstrated that Kylo wasn’t a Vader clone. Where Grand Moff Tarkin insouciantly stayed on the Death Star despite being told “there is a danger,” Hux was the first to evacuate Starkiller Base. Wow, these are some villains. The First Order is proving to be a pale imitation of the Empire.

Captain Phasma decided to shut down the shield because a traitor – who had recently demonstrated that he couldn’t shoot unarmed villagers - held a gun to her head. The fate of Starkiller Base is sealed by her decision. Phasma is shown to be a sad excuse for a Stormtrooper and utterly undeserving of her conspicuously shiny armor. Doubtless, she will return but her character has been damaged.

What is the political situation thirty years after the deaths of the Emperor and Darth Vader? General Leia appears to command a single base with a few dozen X-wings. She is part of The Resistance. Resistance to what? The Empire is gone, right? There is a New Republic. We saw the capitol planet of the New Republic destroyed, right? Why aren’t Leia, Akbar, and all the rest part of the military of this New Republic? Where are the capital ships aligned with the Republic or the Resistance? The planet where Leia is based is going to be destroyed and the best she can muster is a couple of dozen fighters? Wow, that’s pathetic. It very much seems like the First Order is the governing body though, at the same time, they are talking about conquest. But there is virtually nothing standing in your way? Why did you bother with the planet killer if there isn’t anyone actually opposing you?

The First Order comes across as generally incompetent. Not one but two of our heroes escape in separate incidents. During one of those escapes, another team has simultaneously infiltrated the base. Their impressive Starkiller Base, like previous planet vaporizing weapons, manages to take one shot before it is destroyed by a handful of enemies. The First Order has great set designers but they aren’t so great at the fighting. Of the many battles that First Order fought, they only won one, which was when they attacked a mostly unarmed village. Not an auspicious beginning for the forces of darkness.

There is a new and bigger death star. Wow, we haven’t gone there before. Granted, that first one was really quite cool. It was unfortunate that it was destroyed before it got to really instill terror across the galaxy. The second one was pathetic and a death trap. It blew up ships here and there but never got to target a planet. This new one is stupid. I can accept a moon-sized space station with a cannon that is powerful enough to destroy a planet. Hey, it’s just physics. A big enough gun will turn a planet into an asteroid field. But Starkiller Base is different. First, it is in System A while the target planet is in System X. The ‘projectile’ is fired and traverses who knows how many light years in mere moments. Moreover, the projectile – which appears as just an energy beam – has a guidance system that allows it to turn toward the target planet. Maybe that was gravity pulling it to the targets? No, at the speed it was going, a black hole would have trouble modifying its trajectory. I would have gone for a massive torpedo. Yeah, that would be doable. Modify some obsolete frigate, fill it with explosives, and have it hit a planet at light speed. The Starkiller just defied physics. Worse, there was that stupid visual of the planets exploding. If a planet around Alpha Centauri exploded, we wouldn’t know about it on Earth for years. And we certainly wouldn’t be able to see the explosion during daylight with the naked eye! Even though this is science-fantasy, this really grated on me. Much as I think it has been done quite enough, I would have preferred Death Star 3 to this travesty.

This far, far away galaxy has never heard of a history book. In the first trilogy, characters have never heard of the Jedi and find the Force to be something bizarre. But in the prequels, the Jedi Council is a branch of galactic governance, its members are the generals during the Clone Wars. Heck, Chewy fought alongside Yoda! Now in this one, Rey thinks Luke Skywalker is a myth! That Han has to confirm Luke’s existence is just odd. “The Berlin Wall, the Cold War. It’s all true.” Even in the prequels, this problem persisted. In such a technologically advanced society, how did a whole star system just vanish from the star charts and only some short order cook knew about it?

Speaking of star charts, what was with that kooky map? In the super high-tech world of Star Wars, there is no such thing as email. The map is on a memory chip of some kind and can never be copied or transmitted. Moreover, shouldn’t it just be galactic coordinates. I’m sure there must be some mapping system similar to latitude and longitude that would map even unexplored regions. Even when the data is at the Resistance base in the dormant R2-D2, it is inaccessible. How does technology work in this galaxy? Of course, this could now be a complaint of the original movie. Why didn’t Leia just email the Death Star plans to the Rebel Alliance? Email was virtually unknown in 1977. In 2015, we can watch a movie on a phone that fits in our pocket. It is troubling that some of our current technology exceeds that of the Star Wars universe.

Luke does not appear until the final scene. He was kept out of the story because including him would have undercut the new characters. Really, once Luke is on scene, he becomes the central character while everyone else is a sidekick. Though I understand the reasoning, it makes Luke look bad. One of his apprentices has just turned to the Dark Side and killed the other Jedi trainees so Luke runs away and hides? Moreover, he left some sort of map to find him? Are we playing hide and seek? It is going to take some good writing to rehabilitate Luke from this apparently cowardly act.

The most important thing about The Force Awakens is the absence of a Jar Jar Binks character. Nor was there any mention of midi-chlorians. And, as already mentioned, the central character wasn’t a plaintive Anakin. Yes, it is a rehash, it has lots of unanswered questions, it used some weak plot devices, but it was fun. Most of the characters have lots of promise for future development.

Sunday, November 10, 2013

Ender’s Game (movie)

In a strange twist from the usual, I liked the movie better than the book. First off, the siblings’ desire to rule the Earth was dropped completely. This is Ender’s story and his elder brother’s quest for world dominance is best left out of it. Next, the adults actually interact with the students. In the book, it often seemed like the space station was peopled only with prepubescent kids who battled in zero-g and developed tactics that had never been conceived. That is retained to a large degree but adult supervision and training is evident; these kids are being given a foundation on which to build rather than left to their own devices. Where I thought the novel was ludicrous in relying on a 12 year-old to save humanity, the movie paints it in a more plausible light. The battles come across as extremely advanced video games where youths can adapt quickly rather than relying on old tactics that a veteran would have a hard time discarding. Moreover, the idea of telling them that it is merely a simulation rather than the real thing allows them to take risks that few commanders would dare.

In some ways, the movie made odd choices. The original invasion by the Formics is shown as happening in the modern day with fighter jets battling swarms of alien craft in the atmosphere whereas in the book the battle took place in space. Rackham, the hero of that battle, is shown as just a random pilot rather than a commander of a fleet. In the book, Ender defeated the enemy while in the Solar System, not traveling to the Formic colony where he finds a queen’s egg until years afterward; that would make for a long and clunky epilogue so the change is understandable.

One of the things that the movie completely overlooks is the distances. There is a reason that it has been 50 years since the war and that there is a specific deadline for the counterattack. Humanity sent fleets decades ago but, on account of distance, they aren’t arriving until now. This setup allowed for the military on earth to train commanders for the remote fleets. Also not discussed – though it did get mentioned – is the ansible. The ansible is a physics-defying communications system that allows instant communication between Earth and these distant fleets. Handy.

Asa Butterfield does a good job as Ender. He manages to be calculating and cold-blooded while still remaining a sympathetic character. Perhaps his youth provides that. It is hard to say much on the adult roles since they were almost footnotes in the book. Colonel Graff (Harrison Ford) figured most prominently in opening dialogues for each chapter, commenting on how Ender was fairing. The movie provides more interaction between the two than I recall from the novel. As for Rackham (Ben Kingsley), the fact that he is still around 50 years after the battle that made him famous is never explained. In the book, he traveled around at near light speed to make him available for when the fleets would arrive. The movie supposes that he was a young pilot and is now an old veteran.

The movie does repeat some of my problems with the book. For instance, why is it that the Formics only attempt communication with Ender? There are scores of kids at Battle School and one supposes that many of them play the game that allowed Ender to communicate with the aliens. Apparently like the adults of Earth, they too knew that Ender was ‘the one’ and focused their efforts on him. Knowing that humanity is coming to wipe them out, why didn’t the Formics dispatch some ships to establish new colonies to escape extinction rather than depend upon the kindness of their exterminator? I understand the idea of culling through all of humanity for a super genius tactician but is it necessary that all his junior officers are his age? Couldn’t veterans follow orders as well, if not better, than adolescents?

Nitpicks aside, I enjoyed the film and give it a thumbs up.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Ender's Game (book)

Some years ago, a co-worker lent me a copy of Ender's Game.  I read it and wrote a review.  Now that the movie version is coming to a theater near you, it seems an ideal time to post that here.

Ender's Game
Andrew ‘Ender’ Wiggin is a genius, just like his older siblings, Peter and Valentine. Ender is an outcast because he is a third child, something that is generally illegal thanks to population controls. Ender lives in a future Earth where humanity is threatened by the Buggers, an alien race of insect-like creatures that might well have wiped out humanity but for Mazer Rackham. Humanity has built the fleet for a counterattack, has the weapons to fight, but lacks a battle commander to direct them against an overwhelming force. Ender will be that commander if only his training can be completed in time. His training begins when he is six and the epic battles come when he is twelve. The epilogue proceeds until he is into his twenties.

The book is quite readable and very engaging. The characters are good and easy to like. The setting is well made. I was surprised to find a book written in 1985 having such things as the internet (the Nets) and tablet computers (simply called desks). I was disappointed by the Buggers. We never actually saw a Bugger, getting only a vague description of them. The idea that a hive mind was some Earth-shaking news was dorky. If Orson Scott Card was the first to write a story with a hive mind, maybe, but the hive mind/insect alien was decades old by the time this book was written. People of the future should be less surprised by this development than a modern day fiction reader (that would be me).

Though enjoyable, the book is preposterous. Humanity is resting all its hopes on a 12 year-old boy; there is no contingency plan if this should fail. It is explained to the reader that should Ender fail, humanity will probably be wiped out (as it turns out, that was an incorrect conclusion on the part of the generally incompetent adults). As the enemy is light years away, the ships launched to attack them decades ago and only now are they arriving at the Bugger worlds. Thanks to a physics-ignoring radio (instant communication regardless of distance) those ships can receive commands from Earth in real time. So, with decades to prepare, humanity cuts it down to the wire and pins its fate on Ender and his classmates. Sounds reasonable.

Why did the fight become genocide? Sure, destroying the Bugger home world was a serious blow but if all the colony worlds had queens too, shouldn’t the Buggers still exist? Ender didn’t destroy any of those worlds so, unless the queens were on the destroyed ships (which would be stupid), those worlds should have intact populations though no fleet to protect them. When Ender arrives on one, it hasn’t been bombed – buildings still standing for human settlers. The Buggers saw the end coming and, rather than send a fleet with a queen to inhabit some new world and hide from humanity, they built a replica of Ender’s game world and left the seed of their rebirth in the hopes that their destroyer might plant it. Uh huh. Yeah, that’s how I would deal with imminent extinction.

No one understood tactics and strategy until Ender arrived at battle school. It has been 80 years since Mazer Rackham defeated the Bugger invasion fleet (therefore zero-G combat has been around at least that long) and yet Ender develops a combat style that is unprecedented and no other student is capable of emulating it so that Ender doesn’t completely destroy them in battles. Never does Ender learn something in a lecture (if there are lectures at this school) and then apply it in the ‘Game.’ No, everything is new and from the mind of Ender. Napoleon was lucky he never had to face this prodigy on the battlefields of Europe. As described, Ender probably would have wiped out Napoleon’s Grand Army while only suffering 5 casualties.

Okay, one supra ultra mega genius kid is maybe okay. However, it turns out that his brother and sister are just as smart though they were rejected the post of Savior of Humanity on account of their emotional attributes. While Ender is busy learning – no, developing how – to defeat the Buggers, his brother and sister are busy influencing world opinion through internet commentary. How did such dull-witted parents produce this trio of incomparable brilliance? There was no talk of genetic manipulation or selective breeding. No, they are just supremely smart for no apparent reason.

For 120 pages, the story is told entirely from Ender’s perspective, except for a very brief dialogue at the beginning of each chapter where the adults in charge of his training comment on his progress or difficulties. Then, quite unexpectedly, we switch to his siblings. Peter has decided he wants to rule the world and convinces Val to join him in the endeavor by writing opinions. These two are SO brilliant that they quickly rise to rock star status (and not just some random rock star, we’re talking an Elvis) as commentators and being invited to join think tanks and presidential panels. And they achieve this level of success while remaining anonymous. See, no one else thought to say these things. As a constant reader of opinion columns, I can tell you that it’s an echo chamber out there with dozens of writers saying more or less the same thing though with this twist or that nuance. The idea of someone being SO unique as to coalesce a movement through anonymous writing is beyond belief. I suspect he was modeling this on the Federalist Papers written by Publius (who was by turns Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and James Madison). However, that was in an era where the written word was the only form of news. Even today, most people get news from radio or TV.

This is a book for tweens and teens. In many ways, it felt like I was reading a Charlie Brown comic since adults are virtual non-entities. We quickly learn that Ender’s parents are dim bulbs compared to their children. At one point, Val (age 11) is telling Peter (age 13) that they were just kids and can’t change the world but Peter showed her otherwise by launching himself on the world scene to become Hegemon of Earth. The moral is that young people can make a difference, maybe save humanity, maybe rule the world.

Again, I liked the book but by the end it was just too preposterous. Card tells his tale well but it is along the lines of Flight of the Navigator, ET, Goonies, or The Last Starfighter, only more so and by a factor of 1000. This is a book that Steven Spielberg might have turned into a movie in the 1980s: Children save the day and adults are generally clueless.

We'll have to see how the movie compares.  Doubtless a review will appear here at some point.