Konstantin Kisin of Triggernometry hosted a debate between Kellie-Jay Keen (aka Posie Parker) and Dr Helen Webberley on the topic of transgender. The sparks flew from the very start as it was clear that neither guest respected the views of the other. Keen has been one of the most visible anti-transgender personalities for nearly a decade. She holds that transgender is a mental disorder and that it is medical malpractice to treat them with hormone blockers or surgery. She is particularly opposed to such treatment being given to minors. By contrast, Webberley holds that transgender youth are able to decide their gender and that Keen was causing harm with her statements.
A good portion of the debate was Keen attempting to elicit exactly what age was appropriate for a child to decide on gender, how many encounters with a medical professional should be required before hormone blockers could be considered, whether gender dysphoria was a mental illness associated with other conditions (e.g., homosexuality, autism), and whether treatment resulted in permanent sexual disfunction. Webberley refused to pick a specific age for treatment, though she offered 15 as a reasonable age, but would not categorically rule out 11. She dismissed the idea of contributing conditions, even suggesting that the autism diagnosis might be in error. Gender dysphoria is not a mental disorder and saying that it was is hate speech, which is illegal under British law. Both ended the debate by declaring the other should be in jail, Keen for hate speech and Webberley for child abuse. Lively!
Keen's big weakness was that she would refer to studies and then not cite them. Which study? She mentioned a few examples, but that is all anecdotal. However, she was specific and clear in what her views were. There was nothing vague or gray in her answers. Webberley was hopelessly ambiguous and offered nothing specific except that the law stood on her side. At one point she said that sex cannot be changed and at another point, she said that a trans-woman is indeed a woman. Okay, which is it? She would then explain the issue in such a way that it was entirely confusing. She had a strategy of filibustering, denouncing interruptions and going on tangents. She denounced Kisin for platforming Keen.
Keen's argument was far superior. Webberley spent much of her time being offended and giving answers as clear as mud. Comments on the debate massively favored Keen. That said, it was not an hour well spent. Much of this was the same old stuff gone over again, with Keen offering the standard litany and Webberley mostly offering non-answers with accusations of bigotry on the side.
