Showing posts with label Nigel Hawthorne. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Nigel Hawthorne. Show all posts

Friday, August 23, 2024

Amistad (1997)

It is 1839 and La Amistad, a Spanish schooner, is asea with a cargo hold full of slaves.  The slaves break free of their chains and kill most of the Spanish crew.  Those Spaniards left alive are ordered to sail the ship to Africa.  Of course, the sailors deceive the slaves by sailing toward the sunrise by day but turn around at night.  Eventually, the Amistad is intercepted by an American ship and taken to Connecticut.  Initially, it is assumed that a slave revolt had occurred, in which case the slaves would be executed and the Spaniards allowed to leave with their ship.  However, it was instead determined that the 'slaves' were from Africa.  The African slave trade is illegal.  Ergo, these are not slaves, but free men who had every right to kill those who held them in bondage.  This was an inconvenient conclusion for both Spain and the United States.  President Van Buren (Nigel Hawthorne) wanted the ship and slaves sent back to Cuba or Spain, anywhere that would make them someone else's problem.

Abolitionist Lewis Tappan (Stellan Skarsgard) eagerly takes up the case of the enslaved Africans.  He hires Roger Sherman Baldwin (Matthew McConaughey) to argue the case.  As the Africans don't speak English, it is necessary to find an interpreter, who happens to be sailor currently in port, James Covey (Chiwetel Ejiofor).  Now they can interview the Africans and get the story, most importantly that of their leader, Cinque (Djimon Hounsou).  Despite difficulties, Baldwin wins the case!  But the government appeals to the Supreme Court.  Now former President and current Congressman John Quincy Adams (Anthony Hopkins) joins the case to argue the Africans' cause.

Overall, the movie gets the story correct.  However, there are many details over which to quibble.  Roger Baldwin is painted as a poor young lawyer who is getting his first big case.  McConaughey was in his late 20s when the movie was made.  The real Roger Baldwin was in his mid-40s and from a prominent family.  Queen Isabella II (Anna Paquin) was not yet of age to rule.  Those scenes where her advisors talk to her about the slave ship in American are just nonsense.  Queen Maria Christina was the regent during most of the Amistad drama.  Theodore Joadson (Morgan Freeman) is a fictional character; why?  What, you don't have enough characters already that you want to spend some screen time with a fictional one?

President Van Buren is treated badly by the script.  First, he did not go on the campaign trail to kiss babies and give stump speeches.  Campaigns were run by surrogates while the candidate stayed home.  Whistle stops are decades in the future.  Nor was he photographed while in office; the first president photographed in office was James K Polk in 1849.  That John C Calhoun should show up to a state dinner and embarrass Van Buren in front of the Spanish Minister is unthinkable.  Van Buren was a gifted politician (earning nicknames such as Little Magician and Red Fox of Kinderhook) who was the tactician behind President Andrew Jackson.  There is a reason that Jackson selected Van Buren as his successor.  Casting Nigel Hawthorne, who had recently (1994) portrayed the mentally disturbed King George III, further diminishes Van Buren.  He is walked over by his own cabinet secretaries, browbeaten by his opponents, and generally shown to be incompetent.  Good grief!

By contrast, John Quincy Adams comes across as the greatest former president who ever was.  Where most presidents vanish into retirement, Adams was elected to the House of Representatives only a couple of years after his presidency and remained there until he died in 1848.  During his lifetime, he had spent time in all the political parties (Federalist, Democratic-Republican, National Republican, Anti-Masonic, and finally Whig).  Hopkins does a great job with the character.

Overall, the film has uneven pacing and not enough focus.  Spielberg is telling too many stories.  If this was a mini-series, all of these characters could have arcs, but not here.  Dump the scenes in Spain, leave Van Buren out, delete the fictional characters, and focus on the story on Cinque.  Act 1, the revolt on the Amistad to the capture.  Act 2, the first trial where Baldwin wins.  Act 3, the Supreme Court and John Quincy Adams.  The rest is just filler that takes away from this central story and these most important characters.

Entertaining but not particularly educational.  The best part is Hopkins as JQ Adams.

Tuesday, March 15, 2022

The Madness of King George (1994)

In 1788, King George III (Nigel Hawthorne) is going about his kingly duties and bemoaning the loss of the colonies.  Prime Minister Pitt (Julian Wadham) reminds him that they are independent now.  Other than his dismay at the loss of America, the king seems fine.  Then he wakes up at 4 AM and commences to rant and rave, dash about in his bed clothes with various servants chasing, and even attempts to ravish the beautiful Lady Pembroke (Amanda Donahoe) despite the presence of his wife, Queen Charlotte (Helen Mirren).  Efforts are made to hide the odd behavior of the king, but the Prince of Wales (Rupert Everett) engineers a public appearance where the king's madness is exposed.  While doctors - mostly in the pocket of the prince - endeavor to restore the king's sanity, Mr. Fox (Jim Carter) proposes a bill of regency that will grant all the powers of the monarchy to the prince.  As the days drag into weeks, the votes accumulate to pass the proposed regency bill.  Requiring a specialist, Francis Willis (Ian Holm) was summoned from Lincolnshire to treat the king.  Can Willis restore the king before he is usurped by his power-hungry son?

I had originally seen this while I was taking English History at the University of Iowa.  Though we were covering the Restoration (1660) at the time, the professor could not help but comment on the film.  He thought it was mostly good though he questioned the emphasis on George III's obsession about the loss of America shown in the film.  He particularly liked the joke about Piss the Younger and Piss the Elder, which didn't click with me at the time.  Pitt the Elder was prime minister from 1766 to 1768, while his son, Pitt the Younger, was PM from 1783-1801 and again from 1804-1806.

The most glaring error that I saw was the representation of the United States on the globe in the King's office.  It showed the US in possession of the Louisiana Purchase (1804) and with the Oregon Treaty boundary settled on the 49th parallel (1846).  This is a very specific window, as the US would acquire the southwest from Mexico two years later.

Though usually cast as a villain on this side of the Atlantic, George is quite likable here.  I wonder how accurate Hawthorne's portrayal is.  Did the king really say, "what what" as a tick?  Though he recovered from this bout of madness, he had a recurrence in 1810 that resulted in The Regency Act of 1811.  George III died in 1820.

Outstanding film that has both drama and comedy.  Better still, it provides fairly accurate history of the period though it does compress a few things for the sake of the narrative.  Highly recommended.