In December, I posted about the increase of mass shootings during the Obama Administration. I used a spreadsheet provided by Mother Jones. That spreadsheet has been updated but does not include last night's carnage at the Pulse Nightclub in Orlando. Let's explore the numbers.
Admin
|
Count
|
Dead
|
Wounded
|
Reagan
|
7
|
70
|
76
|
Bush I
|
7
|
63
|
52
|
Clinton
|
18
|
114
|
146
|
Bush II
|
15
|
127
|
91
|
Obama
|
33
|
247
|
229
|
Total
|
80
|
621
|
594
|
Even without including the 50+ dead from last night, Obama dominates the numbers. However, this table is a bit skewed. Bush I only served one term so his numbers are worse than they look. Obama hasn't completed his second term and not quite comparable to his predecessors. Let's break that down by month:
Admin
|
Dead
|
Wounded
|
Reagan
|
0.7
|
0.8
|
Bush I
|
1.3
|
1.1
|
Clinton
|
1.2
|
1.5
|
Bush II
|
1.3
|
0.9
|
Obama
|
2.8
|
2.6
|
Obama has another 7 months to go and the trend does not look good.
Obviously, if these two tables could have been produced where a Republican had such a high number compared to his Democrat predecessors, his policies would be blamed. Even though the media would never do that here, is it the case? Are Obama policies responsible for the dramatic increase in mass shootings? I'm not sure if his actual policies are responsible but I think his expressed attitude is. That is to say that Obama hasn't signed a law that made mass shootings easier or more frequent but he has not been a cheerleader for America or American power. The United States under Obama is a nation in decline, a nation whose influence and reach is contracting. Weakness invites attack.
No comments:
Post a Comment